Ripple’s Legal Officer Slams Senator Warren Over Stablecoin Bill Opposition
Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, has criticized Elizabeth Warren, a United States Senator representing Massachusetts, for opposing key legislation aimed at regulating stablecoins in the United States.
In Brief
- Stuart Alderoty accused Senator Warren of undermining bipartisan efforts to establish consumer protections in the stablecoin market.
- Senator Schumer urged Democrats to withhold support and push for stronger oversight of foreign issuers like Tether.
- Senator Gallego said the current bill ignored key protections and dismissed Democratic input, prompting a unified call for revisions.
The bill, called the GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins), is now at the center of political tension among lawmakers.
Alderoty expressed his frustration in a post on X, stating that Senator Warren’s long-standing opposition to the crypto industry has led her to block a bipartisan bill designed to protect consumers. He accused the senator of putting political gain ahead of sound policymaking.
The Ripple CLO made this comment as the stablecoin bill faces growing resistance in the Senate, especially from Democrats who had earlier signaled a willingness to work with Republicans on a version of the legislation.
The GENIUS Act proposes a set of rules that would regulate how stablecoins are issued and managed in the country. It would require stablecoins to be backed entirely by real U.S. dollars or short-term U.S. Treasury bonds, ensuring that every token issued is matched by assets considered safe and liquid.
In addition, companies would be required to publicly disclose their reserve holdings each month. For issuers with more than $50 billion in stablecoins, the law would mandate annual financial audits to enhance transparency and accountability.
These measures aim to reduce the risk of fraud and financial instability in the stablecoin market.
Warren’s Objection and the Trump Factor
Senator Warren has pushed back against the bill, urging the Senate not to pass it. Over the weekend, she raised concerns about what she described as a shady deal between the Trump family and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). According to Warren, the deal resulted in a Trump-associated stablecoin suddenly becoming the seventh largest in the world.
She claimed the surge in the stablecoin’s market value stemmed from a “shady crypto deal” involving the UAE, which allegedly committed a large amount of funding. Warren framed the situation as an example of political and financial corruption—arguing that powerful interests are using crypto for personal gain while regulatory protections remain weak.
Democrats Reverse Support Over Last-Minute Changes
On May 3, reports surfaced that key Senate Democrats withdrew support for the latest version of the GENIUS Act after Republicans introduced sudden revisions.
According to Democratic aides and senators involved in the talks, the version presented for floor consideration removed several improvements that had been negotiated in earlier bipartisan discussions.
Last Thursday, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer advised his fellow Democratic senators to hold off on pledging their support. He urged them to use their influence to push for additional changes, particularly in how the bill would regulate foreign companies like Tether, the world’s largest stablecoin issuer.
Tether, based outside the U.S., has long faced questions about the transparency of its reserves and whether it fully complies with international financial laws.
Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego, a Democrat and one of nine senators who signed a joint statement over the weekend, defended the party’s decision to oppose the bill in its current form. In a post on X, Gallego said Democrats had been working with Republicans in good faith to shape legislation that balances innovation with proper oversight.
“This isn’t some reversal out of nowhere,” Gallego said. “The bill that was introduced for floor consideration back-pedaled on a lot of the progress we made and did not include other improvements we sought.”
He added that Democrats were not willing to support a version of the bill that ignored their input and weakened the consumer protections they had fought to include.
It seems they want us to suck it up and vote for this bill without our input. That’s not what we expected during this negotiation and not how I operate. Our statement makes clear we won’t let them jam us. Looking forward to continuing to get this bill to a better place
Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego
Despite the current standoff, lawmakers from both parties appear open to further negotiations.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Ifeoluwa specializes in Web3 writing and marketing, with over 5 years of experience creating insightful and strategic content. Beyond this, he trades crypto and is skilled at conducting technical, fundamental, and on-chain analyses.
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.