Vitalik Buterin Opposes Chat Control: A Battle for Digital Privacy

The battle around “Chat Control” goes far beyond a simple technical issue. Behind this controversial law, the European Union is redefining digital privacy, raising major concerns for individual freedom. Vitalik Buterin, a major crypto figure, opposes it head-on, warning about a project with potentially explosive consequences.

Crypto: a digital battle for privacy

Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, has chosen to speak out to denounce a bill he considers as dangerous as illusory. His message is simple: society is not protected by sacrificing individual security. In a world already saturated with cyber threats, adding mandatory backdoors is equivalent to rolling out a red carpet for hackers.

What strikes in this matter is the straightforwardness of the discourse. Buterin refuses the soft compromise that some hoped for. He opposes a clear vision of privacy as a fundamental right, not as a variable to adjust. This stance challenges the crypto community, where privacy, seen as a luxury, should nevertheless be a norm.

For Buterin,

We all deserve privacy and security, without inevitably hackable backdoors, for our private communications.

Speaking on X, Buterin is not just speaking to Europeans. He sends a global signal. Crypto and decentralized technologies offer a credible alternative against governments weakening digital freedoms.

Lawmakers’ hypocrisy highlighted

Beyond the technical aspect, it is the political side that causes gritting of teeth. According to a report revealed by EU Reporter, some ministers and security agencies would seek to exempt themselves from surveillance obligations. Simply put, the rules would apply to citizens, but not to those who write them.

Buterin did not hesitate to call this stance revealing. How to justify that a device said to be essential to public security becomes useless, even bothersome, when it directly concerns those governing? The contradiction is blatant, and it fuels mistrust towards legislation already perceived as intrusive.

This double standard is not new, but in the current context, it acts as a catalyst. Connected citizens, already sensitive to digital surveillance, see that the promised balance between freedom and security remains fragile. It is precisely this soil that nourishes the rise of alternative solutions like those offered by Web3.

Web3, a natural refuge against surveillance

Faced with this bill, crypto defenders highlight an obvious truth: if the centralized sphere becomes a controlled and vulnerable space, users will look elsewhere. And this “elsewhere” could well be the decentralized platforms of Web3.

Hans Rempel, CEO of Diodo, reminds us that the motto “not your keys, not your data” takes on full meaning against the prospect of institutionalized backdoors. These infrastructures allow everyone to remain master of their exchanges, without a central intermediary likely to be constrained by intrusive regulation.

Elisenda Fabrega, from Brickken, recently engaged in a strategic partnership with Credefi, adds an essential point: the adoption of such a system risks fragmenting the European digital market. While the EU prides itself on being a key player in defining data protection standards, this type of measure could instead marginalize it. By seeking to strengthen its control, it risks losing its international credibility.