What You Say to ChatGPT Could Be Used Against You in Court

The rise of AI raises a question that many avoid: what happens to our words once entrusted to the machine? Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, warns that conversations with ChatGPT, far from being confidential, could be used as evidence in court.

Talking to an AI is not the same as talking to a professional

Entrusting your thoughts to an AI leaves a trace. As long as the law does not protect this data as professional secrets, it can be turned against you.

Sam Altman himself admitted it: if you discuss your personal problems with AI and a lawsuit later arises, OpenAI could be compelled to provide that data. Altman has already demonstrated this stance by publicly distancing himself from Robinhood’s tokenized shares when they threatened the company’s image or principles.

This legal loophole is all the more concerning as AI is increasingly sought for psychological, medical, or financial advice.

For now, legislation remains unclear. No clear framework protects AI users, as is the case in the patient-doctor relationship. While awaiting regulation, caution remains your only defense, even with trading bots.

Surveillance advancing in disguise

Beyond the judicial risk, Altman raises another concern: the more AI spreads, the more states will want to monitor its use. The argument is security: to prevent these technologies from being abused for malicious purposes. But the price to pay is an increasingly fragile private life. And don’t forget that what you say to ChatGPT could one day be turned against you.

According to Altman, a compromise will need to be found between individual freedom and collective security. He says he is ready to sacrifice some confidentiality in the name of safety. A statement that says a lot about the direction major tech companies are taking.

Entrusting your thoughts to a rapidly evolving AI leaves a trace. And as long as the law does not protect this data as professional secrets, this trace can one day be used against you.