Crypto: Uniswap burns 100 million UNI, but the market does not ignite
On December 27, 2025, Uniswap marked a turning point by burning 100 million UNI tokens. Yet, against all expectations, the token price dropped by 6%. A paradox that raises a crucial question: is this long-awaited mechanism really the solution to support UNI’s value, or just a one-time stunt with no future? Analysis of an event shaking the crypto world.
In brief
- Uniswap activates its “fee switch” and burns 100 million UNI, or 0.5% of the total supply.
- Despite the burning of Uniswap, UNI’s price falls by 6%, revealing a skeptical crypto market.
- UNI’s future will depend on its ability to scale its revenues and convince crypto investors of its long-term viability.
A Historic Burn: 100 Million UNI Tokens Reduced to Ashes
On December 27, 2025, Uniswap activated its “fee switch”, a mechanism that burns a portion of trading fees to reduce the UNI supply. This first burn involved 100 million tokens, about 0.5% of the total supply. A decision awaited for years, following a crypto community vote approving the “UNIfication” proposal.
This mechanism aims to create artificial scarcity, theoretically beneficial for the token’s price. Hayden Adams, Uniswap’s founder, tempered expectations, noting it’s still too early to measure the impact. Fees collected are burned in small batches, and the process is still in the testing phase. This burn is part of a broader strategy to reinforce UNI’s value. Yet, despite its size, it was insufficient to reassure investors, as evidenced by the market’s immediate reaction.
The Unexpected Flop: UNI Crypto Drops 6% Despite the Burn
Despite the burning of 100 million tokens, UNI’s price dropped 6% on December 29, surprising observers. The 24-hour trading volume reached $1.3 billion, confirming investor interest but also their skepticism. Analysts point to insufficient revenue generated by the fee switch, estimated at only $30,000 per day.
A trivial amount for a protocol the size of Uniswap, which accumulated over $1 billion in fees in one year. Hayden Adams criticized the hasty analyses, calling them misleading. According to him, Uniswap’s budget is meant to finance future developments, not to reimburse liquidity providers. A statement that did not suffice to calm UNI holders’ fears.
Crypto: UNI, a Burn Foretelling a Bright Future?
Is burning 100 million UNI tokens the prelude to a golden age for the crypto? It will all depend on Uniswap’s ability to scale its revenue and optimize its fee switch. If the mechanism manages to generate significant revenue, it could reduce UNI’s supply and support its price long-term. However, challenges are many. Competition with other DEXs like PancakeSwap or Trader Joe is fierce.
Moreover, adoption of the fee switch must be massive to have a tangible impact. Examples from BNB or ETH post-London Upgrade show that patience is key. If Uniswap manages to convince crypto investors of its mechanism’s viability, UNI could indeed enter a new era. Conversely, if revenues stagnate, the token may remain under pressure, leading to disappointment.
Burning 100 million UNI tokens was a historic event, but the 6% price drop reminds us that promises alone are not enough. Uniswap’s fee switch is a promise, not yet a revolution. The success of this burn will depend on its ability to generate sustainable revenue and convince crypto investors. Will Uniswap manage to turn this innovation into a lasting competitive advantage?
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
The world is evolving and adaptation is the best weapon to survive in this undulating universe. Originally a crypto community manager, I am interested in anything that is directly or indirectly related to blockchain and its derivatives. To share my experience and promote a field that I am passionate about, nothing is better than writing informative and relaxed articles.
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.