BRICS

As economic tensions intensify between major powers, a dissenting voice challenges the dominant narrative in Washington. According to Boris Kopeikin, chief economist at the Stolypin Institute, the US trade deficit with China is not the result of a BRICS strategy, but rather a structural weakening of the American economy. This interpretation reignites the debate on the root causes of American imbalances in a world undergoing major reconfiguration.

American crude is losing ground. This week, the Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), India’s leading public refiner, turned its back on shipments from the United States to refocus on the Middle East and West Africa. This logistical rebalancing, seemingly technical, reflects a strategic shift: the rise of energy alliances within the BRICS, the decline of the dollar in oil trade, and the assertion of a new economic order.

While the West defends the supremacy of the dollar and the euro, Moscow and Beijing accelerate their divorce from these currencies. Vladimir Putin confirmed that Russo-Chinese trade is now conducted almost exclusively in rubles and yuan. This shift, supported by a spectacular rise in bilateral trade and a deliberate strategy, could mark a decisive step towards a multipolar financial order.

By seeking to isolate his rivals, Donald Trump could well get the opposite effect. Under the pressure of his trade sanctions, the countries of the BRICS bloc, long divided, are beginning an unprecedented strategic rapprochement. As tensions rise, China, India, Russia and their partners seem more willing than ever to cooperate economically and diplomatically.

While the trade war intensifies, Beijing and Moscow show their determination. In July, their exchanges jumped to $19.14 billion, an annual record that contrasts with the gloom of the first half of the year. This rebound occurs as Donald Trump threatens China with new tariffs, after sanctioning India for its Russian oil purchases.

In the face of the fragilization of the global monetary system and the contested dominance of the dollar, the BRICS are moving discreetly but surely towards a strategic alternative: a common currency backed by sovereign digital infrastructures. Driven by a now-expanded and economically influential bloc, this initiative aims to reshape the global monetary balance. As the instability of fiat currencies worsens, the emergence of such a project raises questions for markets, institutions, and observers: is this a strong signal towards a new multipolar economic order?

China remains indifferent to threats and is getting rid of American debt. Bitcoin is lurking.

As emerging powers strengthen their economic cooperation, Donald Trump reignites tensions by directly targeting the BRICS bloc. His tariff threats and offensive remarks aim at much more than just an alliance: they target the hegemony of the dollar, the future of multilateral policies, and ambitions surrounding digital currencies. This position, both political and economic, could reshape international trade and impact the already fragile balances between the Western sphere and the alternative strategies of emerging markets.

As global balances are being redrawn, the BRICS summit in Rio outlined the contours of a more pronounced multipolar influence. Behind the notable absence of Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin, discussions led to concrete proposals: reform of international institutions, enhanced climate cooperation, and regulation of artificial intelligence. Less spectacular, but more strategic, this edition sheds light on the ambitions of the global South, while revealing the latent tensions that weaken the coherence of a bloc in search of credibility.

Donald Trump's announcement of 10% tariffs on BRICS countries reignites a strategic debate: are the United States risking, in their bid to defend their leadership, to accelerate de-dollarization? Behind this commercial offensive lies a deeper rift, where emerging powers seek to break away from the dominance of the greenback. As geo-economic tensions intensify, the question arises: is Washington not hastening the questioning of the monetary order it strives to preserve?

Bitcoin is just a hair away from its all-time high. The volumes on ETFs, the rebellion of the BRICS, and the audacity of the United States are very promising for the future.

At the opening of the BRICS summit in Rio, Donald Trump reignited trade tensions, threatening to impose surtaxes on any country aligned with this emerging bloc. Facing a coalition that challenges American hegemony, the confrontation goes beyond tariffs to affect global power dynamics. The BRICS are intensifying their break from…

Rio is set to host a high-stakes BRICS summit, marked by two historic absences: Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin. The Chinese president is withdrawing for the first time since 2013, while his Russian counterpart remains in the Kremlin, targeted by an arrest warrant from the ICC. At a time when the bloc wants to assert itself against the dollar and strengthen its influence, these withdrawals weaken the group's unity and raise doubts about its geopolitical trajectory.

Can the dollar lose its global supremacy? What was once speculation is now taking a concrete diplomatic turn. As the BRICS summit approaches in Rio, major emerging economies are placing local currency transactions at the heart of their strategy. This shift occurs within a context of growing geopolitical tensions and demands from the Global South for a more balanced financial system. Behind this dynamic lies a possible redefinition of the rules of global trade.

While Israeli strikes target sensitive Iranian sites and Tehran responds with missiles on Tel Aviv, the military escalation is redefining balances in the Middle East. However, a strategic absence intrigues: that of the BRICS. A newcomer to the bloc, Iran was counting on solid support against its sworn enemy. Yet neither Moscow, nor Beijing, nor New Delhi are committing. This silence exposes the limits of an alliance that Tehran saw as a counterweight to Western hegemony.

A discreet yet massive shift is redefining the global monetary balances. Indeed, over 90 countries, led by the BRICS, are abandoning the dollar in their international exchanges. In its place, the yuan, the ruble, or the rupee are gradually taking over. This strategic realignment, far from being a mere technical adjustment, challenges the financial order built around the United States since the post-war period. A stated desire for economic sovereignty and a direct challenge to American hegemony over global flows are at the root of this movement.

On June 8, 2025, a tanker under American and European sanctions discreetly docked in Japan, delivering Russian crude to a local refinery. This act, far from negligible, reveals a silent fracture in the Western consensus on energy. While the G7 has been trying for two years to isolate Moscow, Tokyo prioritizes its energy security. This episode, both symbolic and strategic, could subtly reshape the lines of a transforming global energy order.

As the BRICS summit in Rio approaches, Ron Paul sounds the alarm: a monetary shift is underway. The parliamentarian mentions a "Rio Reset," a coordinated offensive by emerging economies to marginalize the dollar in global trade. Behind this statement lies a broader dynamic: the emergence of a multipolar financial order. As monetary tensions intensify, the initiative backed by the BRICS could accelerate a paradigm shift with global consequences.

As global trade lines shift under geopolitical pressure, Moscow is considering swapping traditional currencies for cryptocurrencies for its agricultural exports. This is not a marginal experiment but a massive project: the settlement of 49.5 million tons of grain could be done in crypto. An initiative that, if realized, would redefine the rules of trade for sanctioned states and impose blockchain as an alternative to dominant financial systems.

Morgan Stanley shakes the markets. Indeed, the investment bank forecasts a 9% drop in the US dollar within a year, bringing the currency down to its lowest levels since the pandemic. A shocking projection, published on May 31, which challenges the greenback's dominant status in the global monetary order and fuels fears of a lasting shift in international financial balances.

And what if one of the largest capital transfers in modern history was already underway, away from the spotlight? In the face of rising geopolitical tensions and the fatigue of the dollar-dependent model, Asian nations, led by the BRICS, are initiating a withdrawal of about 7.5 trillion dollars in American assets. This reorientation, based on strategic choices and concrete data, challenges the foundations of Western finance and signals a silent yet decisive restructuring of the global monetary order.

The BRICS Trade Ministers approved this week the "Declaration on WTO Reform and Strengthening the Multilateral Trading System." This is a document in which the group reinforces its commitment to strengthening the multilateral trading system. Additionally, the proposal includes reform of the World Trade Organization (WTO). This declaration also addresses issues such as data governance, sustainability, and strategies through 2030. Meanwhile, the President of the United States, Donald Trump, has once again threatened the European Union (EU) with a 50% tariff starting June 1.

When a consumer product surpasses oil and diamonds in the exports of a country like India, it is no longer just an industrial success, but a strategic shift. The meteoric rise of smartphones as the leading export item reflects a redeployment of the country's economic priorities. This turning point marks the emergence of a manufacturing India connected to global value chains, with possible repercussions on the balance of international trade, technological flows, and ultimately, on digital uses and the dynamics of the crypto economy.

As geopolitical rivalries flare up, dedollarization reemerges as a lever of monetary sovereignty. For a long time, the BRICS have been at the forefront of this ambition, seemingly seeking to challenge the economic order dominated by Washington. However, a strategic repositioning by Brazil, an influential member of the bloc, disrupts this trajectory. By dismissing the idea of a common currency, the country reshuffles the cards of an already fragile project, revealing the limits of monetary coordination in the face of the reality of economic power dynamics.

While the major emerging powers are making calls to reduce their dependence on the US dollar, a key player has just slammed the door on any desire for a break: India. In a tense international context, where Western sanctions are pushing some countries to explore alternatives to the dollar-dominated monetary system, New Delhi chooses to play the stability card. By stating that it has "absolutely no interest" in engaging in a de-dollarization dynamic, India sends a strong signal to its partners within the BRICS and the Global South.

Unbeknownst to the general public, a monetary shift is taking place in Europe. The US dollar is losing ground there. Since the beginning of the year, foreign companies and funds are demanding payments in local currencies, revealing a strategic fracture at the heart of continental finance. This movement, far from being anecdotal, aligns with the ambitions of the BRICS, who are determined to erode the hegemony of the greenback. Discreetly, it is the very architecture of international trade that is wavering, driven by an emerging alliance in search of economic sovereignty.

For a long time perceived as followers, the BRICS are now at the forefront of global growth. According to the latest forecasts from the IMF, these emerging powers will show an economic momentum in 2025 that is significantly higher than that of the United States. This quantitative shift is becoming strategic: the rise of the BRICS is no longer a trend; it is a fact. Their collective performance is redefining the balance of power and necessitating a re-examination of geo-economic equilibria.

In a world where geopolitical fault lines are shifting rapidly, Saudi Arabia plays a delicate tune between two rival blocs. Solicited by the BRICS but still closely tied to the United States, Riyadh is biding its time, suspending its official membership despite signals of openness. While Beijing lures with its economic promises and Washington threatens with tariffs, the kingdom is preserving its options. Does this tactical ambiguity mask a pre-established strategic direction or is it preparing for a major rebalancing on the global chessboard?